(1) This Procedure enacts the Collaborative Service Teaching Policy and set outs the requirements for managing collaborative service teaching arrangements. (2) This Procedure applies to all instances of collaborative service teaching at The University of Queensland (UQ or the University). While it is acknowledged that non-academic units may contribute to the University’s teaching and learning efforts, this Procedure applies explicitly to academic and research units. (3) This Procedure does not apply to the delivery of programs, courses and professional development to non-enrolled students (refer to the Consultancy Procedure clauses 16-19). (4) Key processes and controls for managing collaborative service teaching arrangements include: (5) Funding splits must be negotiated by the Heads of School, or relevant heads of academic/research unit, and signed off by the relevant Executive Dean(s). (6) EFTSL is the default basis for collaborative service teaching funding splits. (7) The following general principles apply when considering whether collaborative service teaching should be documented by a collaborative service teaching agreement. (8) To ensure a clear understanding between the host school and the service teaching provider(s), collaborative service teaching agreements must include: (9) The agreement is to be prepared using the relevant proforma: Collaborative Service Teaching Agreement Form or Collaborative Service Teaching Agreement Form (Research-focused). (10) The host school and the service teaching provider(s) are responsible for consulting about any proposed changes that will impact on the collaborative service teaching agreement. (11) Where it is determined (e.g. through the program review process) that a change in service teaching is required, the proposing party is responsible for providing the other parties with timely notification of relevant changes and/or new course requirements that impact on the collaborative service teaching agreement. (12) The Heads of School, or equivalents, are responsible for ensuring all decisions and agreements are communicated to and within the relevant schools or academic units. (13) Transparency is a feature of the dispute resolution process. A concise record of key points and the agreed outcomes must be documented at all stages of the dispute resolution process. (14) It is acknowledged that disputes could include disagreements about: (15) In the event of a disagreement between the host school and the service teaching provider(s), the collaborative service teaching dispute resolution process outlined below must be followed. (16) Any academic policy issues that emerge out of the dispute resolution discussions must be reported to the Committee for Academic Programs Policy for consideration. (17) All collaborative service teaching arrangements must be reviewed as part of the cyclic academic program review process or as required by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic). (18) Quality of collaborative service teaching is further assured through implementation and follow-up of: (19) The Committee for Academic Programs Policy (CAPP) is responsible for monitoring university-wide compliance with, and review of, this Procedure for its effectiveness and ongoing relevance. (20) A copy of the approved Collaborative Service Teaching Agreement must be kept by both the host school/academic unit and the service teaching provider(s). Agreements are recorded in the University’s curriculum management system and SI-net in accordance with the Information Management Policy.Collaborative Service Teaching Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose and Scope
Section 2 - Process and Key Controls
Top of PageSection 3 - Key Requirements
Funding
Collaborative Service Teaching Agreements
Changes to a Collaborative Service Teaching Agreement
Dispute Resolution
Section 4 - Roles, Responsibilities and Accountabilities
Top of Page
Position
Responsibility
Provost
Arbitrator and final decision maker in dispute cases between the host school and the service teaching provider(s) and dispute is not able to be resolved by the relevant Executive Deans.
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) provides input into academic quality thresholds and assurance of high-quality program, plan and course offerings at the University.
Executive Dean
Signs off on collaborative service teaching funding splits as negotiated by the Heads of School and/or Academic Unit.
Initial decision-maker in the case of dispute cases between the host school and the service teaching provider(s)
Head of School or equivalent within an Academic Unit
Negotiates collaborative service teaching funding splits
Host unit
The school or academic unit (for example, faculty) that is generally aligned with the program that requires the delivery of service teaching and/or provides service teaching opportunities.
Program owner
The faculty that administers the program into which service teaching is being delivered.
Service teaching provider
The school, academic unit (for example, faculty) or research unit (for example, institute or centre) with the recognised discipline expertise that collaborates with a host school to design and deliver service teaching.
Committee for Academic Programs Policy (CAPP)
Consider any academic policy issues that emerge out of the dispute resolution discussions
Review and compliance-monitoring of this Procedure.Section 5 - Monitoring, Review and Assurance
Section 6 - Recording and Reporting
Section 7 - Appendix
Definitions
Term
Definition
Collaborative service teaching
Teaching of or into a course offered in a specific program, for example a core course, by one or more service teaching providers other than the host school or academic unit generally aligned with administering the program.
Collaborative Service Teaching Agreement
An agreement between a host school/academic unit and the relevant service teaching provider(s).
Discipline expertise
A school, faculty, institute or centre may be recognised as having discipline expertise through:
- Either:
- its leadership in teaching and research in the discipline; or
– its leadership in teaching and research in the application of disciplinary knowledge in a professional context; and
- acknowledgement by the University.
View current
This is the current version of the approved document. You can provide feedback on this document to the Enquiries Contact - refer to the Status and Details tab from the menu bar above. To view historical versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.