(1) The purpose of this Policy is to establish key principles and values relating to assessment at The University of Queensland. The Policy is supported by the following procedures and guidelines: (2) This Policy applies to all students enrolled in, and all staff involved in the delivery of, undergraduate and postgraduate courses at The University of Queensland. (3) Details of the University's assessment policies and procedures for higher degree by research candidates are included in the Associated Information tab. (4) Assessment involves making judgements about the extent to which students’ work meets identified standards and confirming from these judgements that students’ have attained the learning outcomes. At The University of Queensland, assessment is used to achieve the following purposes: (5) The University is committed to the provision of high quality, authentic and engaging assessment practices according to the following principles: (6) The design and conduct of assessment according to these principles requires effective collaboration between a number of stakeholders associated with teaching and learning including members of academic and professional staff across the University. (7) The academic roles and accountabilities associated with implementation of this Policy are specified in the Teaching and Learning Roles and Responsibilities Policy. (8) Review of, and compliance with, this Policy is overseen by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) and the Academic Board's Teaching, Learning and Student Experience Committee and Assessment Sub-Committee. (9) Details of assessment must be recorded in the Course Profile in accordance with this Policy and the Course Design Policy. (10) Student records including the final grades, applications and University decisions are filed in the student's personal record in SI-net and TRIM. (11) Records and reports associated with assessment are managed in conjunction with the Information Management Policy and the Annual Programs, Plans and Courses Quality Assurance Procedure.Assessment Policy
Section 1 - Purpose and Scope
Section 2 - Principles and Key Requirements
The assessment process engages students in timely, meaningful learning activities which develop their capacity to make independent judgements about the quality of their own and others’ work.
Teachers have a responsibility to provide timely opportunities for students to demonstrate learning through appropriate assessment tasks and to support learning through effective feedback, as well as to orient students new to university study to university assessment methods and standards. Students have a responsibility to demonstrate evidence of learning through their responses to assessment tasks and to reflect and act on feedback to improve their learning.
Judgements about the quality of students’ performance are made with reference to explicit and predetermined criteria and a standard setting process are applied to define the minimum performance level for competency.
Students and teachers can see that there is an explicit and logical relationship between assessment tasks, the criteria used as the basis of assessment judgements, and the grades associated with different standards of performance.
Assessment measures the intended learning outcomes and provides a consistent and dependable indication of the quality of students’ performance.
The assessment tasks represent appropriate, meaningful, significant and worthwhile forms of accomplishment and, where possible, require knowledge and/or skill demonstrated by successful practitioners in real-life settings.
Assessment will be designed to respect and accommodate the diverse needs of learners, enabling students to interact with and respond to learning outcomes. It supports students’ equitable engagement with the content, format and conduct of assessment to ensure that no individual or groups of students are unfairly advantaged or disadvantaged.
Assessment is integral to course and program design, review and evaluation. There is: quality assurance and moderation of assessment at program- and course-level, and within schools and faculties; collaboration with colleagues to provide the whole-of-program approaches that make assessment a coherent experience for students; and ongoing revision and enhancement of assessment practices.
Assessment is achievable for teachers and students with reasonable effort within the context of a full-time workload as described in the Course Design Policy.
At a program-level, assessment provides a verified measure of student performance. As academic integrity forms a central part of an individual’s intellectual and personal development, students learn how to uphold the value of integrity in their studies and assessment responses, and how to maintain ethical standards.Section 3 - Roles, Responsibilities and Accountabilities
Section 4 - Monitoring, Review and Assurance
Section 5 - Recording and Reporting
Section 6 - Appendix
Definitions, Terms, Acronyms
Term
Definition
Academic integrity
The moral code or ethical policy of academia, including:
1. a commitment to the values of honesty, responsibility, transparency, respect, trust and courage; and
2. the ethical principles that underpin academia and student life, such as maintenance of academic standards; honesty and rigour in assessment responses, research and academic publishing.
Criterion
A property or characteristic by which the quality of something may be judged.
Standard
A definite level of achievement aspired to or attained. Standards specify levels of quality (or achievement, or performance) for each criterion.
Standard setting
Standard setting is a process of systematically determining the score of an assessment that represents the minimum acceptable level of performance. The systematic determination is done by subject matter experts.
View current
This is the current version of the approved document. You can provide feedback on this document to the Enquiries Contact - refer to the Status and Details tab from the menu bar above. To view historical versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.