View current

Annual Programs, Plans and Courses Quality Assurance Procedure

This is the current version of the approved document. You can provide feedback on this document to the Enquiries Contact - refer to the Status and Details tab from the menu bar above. To view historical versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.

Section 1 - Purpose and Scope

(1) This Procedure enacts the Programs, Plans and Courses Quality Assurance Policy.

(2) The annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance process enables evidence-based reflection of all programs, plans and courses offered at the University, including shorter form credentials and pathway programs and courses. This Procedure does not apply to Higher Degree by Research and Higher Doctorate programs.

(3) Internal and external standards and benchmarks, such as Group of Eight benchmarks and the TEQSA Risk Assessment Framework, provide evidence to inform the University’s quality assurance process.

(4) The academic quality assurance process for programs, plans and courses offered at UQ, including shorter form credentials and pathway programs and courses, will:

  1. Ensure regular monitoring and assurance of the quality and sustainability of academic offerings.
  2. Provide contextualised information to support academic quality processes.
  3. Enable evidence-based reflection and feedback on teaching, curriculum, assessment design and integrity, and support development needs.
  4. Consolidate the collection and review of feedback, improvement strategies, and their implementation.
  5. Contribute to the fulfilment of Academic Program Review requirements.
Top of Page

Section 2 - Key Controls

(5) Faculty Teaching and Learning Committees and School Teaching and Learning Committees conduct annual quality assurance reviews of programs, plans and courses, ensuring alignment with the University’s Strategic Plan and enabling continuous evidence-based improvement and risk management.

(6) The process is overseen by the Associate Dean (Academic) in consultation with the Executive Dean and Heads of School, supported by the Faculty Teaching and Learning Committees and School Teaching and Learning Committees. Where a course or shorter form credentials is offered by an Institute, the Institute Director oversees the process and provides quality assurance reports to the Executive Dean of the Faculty most closely aligned.

(7) The process is informed by defined academic quality assurance indicators and contextual data, which are reviewed at program, plan and course level (including shorter form credentials and pathway programs and courses) on an annual basis.

(8) The University academic quality thresholds are set by the Vice-Chancellor, in consultation with the Provost and the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic).

Top of Page

Section 3 - Process and Key Requirements

Annual Programs, Plans and Courses Quality Assurance Method

(9) Faculty Teaching and Learning Committees and School Teaching and Learning Committees, under the guidance of Associate Deans (Academic), Heads of School and Executive Deans, review programs, plans and courses according to the academic quality assurance indicators available via the academic quality assurance dashboards and other detailed reports, available from UQ Reportal.

(10) Academic quality assurance will address quality improvement and enhancement themes nominated by the Vice-Chancellor in consultation with the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic). Academic quality assurance will also address themes identified as program- and plan-level priorities.

(11) Faculty and School staff may be asked to contextualise, further investigate, provide responses or develop action plans to address identified issues for a program, plan or course. Responses and action plans will be coordinated for submission to the AQA Online Response System by the relevant School Director of Teaching and Learning in consultation with the relevant Head/ Heads of School, for endorsement by the Associate Dean (Academic) and approval by the Executive Dean.

(12) Consolidated Faculty reports are approved by the Executive Dean.

(13) The process must be completed annually by mid-year. Faculty summary reports are collated by the Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) and submitted to the Provost, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), and Committee for Academic Programs Policy at the conclusion of the annual process.

(14) Data collected by the annual process must be incorporated into the report and resources for the subsequent year.

Responses and Action Plans

(15) For programs, plans and courses prioritised for action by the relevant Faculty Teaching and Learning Committee or School Teaching and Learning Committee in the year of analysis, responses that contextualise quality assurance data and/or detail action plans will be developed to address identified issues. These may include strategies such as staff professional development, curriculum redesign to ensure continued alignment of learning objectives with program and plan descriptions, or other management activities. The relevant School Director of Teaching and Learning will coordinate the recording of the responses and action plans in the AQA Online Response System, for endorsement by the Associate Dean (Academic), and approval by the Executive Dean.

(16) Action plans are monitored by the Executive Dean, in consultation with the relevant Head/Heads of School and the Associate Dean (Academic).

Annual Programs, Plans and Courses Quality Assurance Indicators and Thresholds

(17) Quality assurance indicators and other contextual data will inform the relevant academic quality assurance dashboards and detailed reports, and reflect the following domains:

  1. Student demand;
  2. Student retention;
  3. Student performance and learning outcomes;
  4. Student satisfaction;
  5. Graduate outcomes (for programs);and
  6. Financial sustainability.

(18) The University academic quality thresholds, as set by the Vice-Chancellor in consultation with the Provost and the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), are submitted to the Committee for Academic Programs Policy, University Senior Executive Team and Academic Board for endorsement.

(19) For some metrics, faculties will be asked to set their own academic quality thresholds. These thresholds will be set by the relevant Faculty Teaching and Learning Committee.

Quality Indicator Threshold Review

(20) University and Faculty-level quality indicators and thresholds are reviewed every five years.

(21) Quality indicators and thresholds may be reviewed sooner than five years if determined by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), in consultation with Planning and Business Intelligence. An earlier review of the thresholds may be needed in response to strategic, operational or reporting changes.

Top of Page

Section 4 - Shorter Form Credentials

(22) All shorter form credentials will undergo review as per the University’s annual academic quality assurance process, or more frequently at the request of the Executive Dean of the Faculty that administers the shorter form credential.

(23) Where shorter form credentials are offered by Institutes, a report from the Institute Director on quality assurance will be submitted for approval to the Executive Dean of the Faculty most closely associated with that Institute.

Top of Page

Section 5 - Annual Quality Assurance Dashboards and Reports

(24) Academic quality is underpinned by indicators and contextual data included in dashboards and other detailed reports provided to Faculties and Schools through the UQ Reportal. Planning and Business Intelligence is responsible for developing and maintaining these dashboards and reports.

(25) The Student Evaluation of Course and Teacher (SECaT) process provides course-level data which are updated and reported at the completion of each Semester (as per the Student Evaluation of Course and Teaching Procedure).

Top of Page

Section 6 - Online Response System

(26) The AQA Online Response System, maintained by Planning and Business Intelligence, records and reports feedback and action plans arising from the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance process.

Top of Page

Section 7 - Roles, Responsibilities and Accountabilities

Position Responsibility
Vice-Chancellor Sets University thresholds in consultation with the Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic).
Provost Provides line-management oversight and feedback to Executive Deans on programs, plans and courses’ quality assurance activities, implementation plans and outcomes
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) Receives the Faculty summary reports.

Determines whether a review of the quality indicators and/or thresholds will be undertaken earlier than five years.
Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) Oversees collection and collation of annual Faculty programs, plans and courses quality assurance reports and the production of a consolidated report for the University.

Coordinates submission of the annual Faculty reports and the consolidated report to the Committee for Academic Programs Policy.
Planning and Business Intelligence Oversees provision of data, dashboards and reports on quality assurance, and the quality assurance indicators.

Provides advice on the quality thresholds for the quality assurance indicators.
Committee for Academic Programs Policy of Academic Board Advises on and assures management of programs, plans and courses quality assurance and relevant processes.

Advises on policy and procedural changes pertaining to programs, plans and courses quality assurance.

Endorse thresholds for annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance.
Executive Dean Approves, monitors and provides advice and feedback on action plans for programs, plans and courses, including shorter form credentials, arising from annual quality assurance processes.

Advises the Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) where a program, plan or course has been prioritised for action in the annual quality assurance process for three consecutive years.

Advises the Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) on programs, plans and courses quality assurance matters and provides feedback to relevant Faculty staff.
Institute Director Where a shorter form credential is offered by the Institute, performs the same responsibilities as the Head of School and provides quality assurance reports to the Executive Dean of the Faculty most closely aligned.
Associate Dean (Academic) Oversees and provides guidance on the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance process.

Reviews and endorses responses and action plans arising from the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance process.

Advises the Committee for Academic Programs Policy on matters arising from the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance process.

Provides feedback to relevant Faculty Teaching and Learning Committees and School Teaching and Learning Committees on programs, plans and courses quality assurance activities and outcomes.
Head of School Ensures appropriate oversight and management of quality assurance at the School level, liaising with relevant staff throughout the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance cycle.

Reviews and endorses responses and action plans pertaining to the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance within their School.
School Director of Teaching and Learning Facilitates analyses and coordinates responses, action plans and submissions for the annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance process.

Provides feedback to program and course staff on programs, plans and courses quality assurance outcomes.
Program Convenor/ Major Convenor Provides feedback and context to annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance. Where required, the Program Convenor and/or Major Convenor may be requested to develop an action plan for program or plan improvement.
Course Coordinator Responsible for providing feedback and context to annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance related to their course.

May be requested to develop an action plan for course improvement, in consultation with the Head of School, relevant School Director of Teaching and Learning, Program Convenor or Plan Convenor.
Top of Page

Section 8 - Monitoring, Review and Assurance

(27) This Procedure is monitored by the Committee for Academic Programs Policy and will be reviewed on a three-year basis.

Top of Page

Section 9 - Recording and Reporting

(28) Reports, implementation plans and associated records are maintained in accordance with the Information Management Policy.

Top of Page

Section 10 - Appendix

Term Explanation
Academic quality assurance indicator A specific, measurable and actionable metric that is used to assess various aspects of a program, plan or course. Indicators are aligned to the quality domains described in the Annual programs, plans and courses quality assurance indicators and thresholds section (see the Annual Quality assurance process guide for more information).
 
Academic quality thresholds Thresholds established to assist with contextualising and interpreting the data for a program, plan or course, that corresponds to an academic quality assurance indicator. Thresholds are set at the University level and/or set for a specific Faculty or School.